By Ann T. Schwing
When a landowner makes a charitable gift of a conservation easement to a nonprofit organization or government entity and elects to seek a federal tax deduction, both landowner and easement holder are subject to federal tax laws and regulations governing the creation, monitoring, amendment, and extinguishment of the easement. A nonprofit easement holder is subject to federal laws governing nonprofit operations. The nonprofit and government holders are also subject to state laws governing the operations of nonprofit organizations and the administration of charitable and other public assets on behalf of the public. All of these laws affect and restrict the ability of nonprofit and government holders to amend and terminate perpetual conservation easements. Contrary to representations made in When Perpetual Is Not Forever: The Challenge of Changing Conditions, Amendment, and Termination of Conservation Easements, 36 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 1 (2012), none of these laws can be ignored.
Cite as: Ann T. Schwing, Perpetuity Is Forever, Almost Always: Why It Is Wrong To Promote Amendment and Termination of Perpetual Conservation Easements, 37 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 217 (2013).[btn link=”http://harvardelr.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2013/05/Schwing.pdf” color=”forestGreen” size=”size-l”]View Full Article (PDF)[/btn]
[…] the publication of The Challenge and corrects misunderstandings asserted in Ann Taylor Schwing’s Perpetuity Is Forever, Almost Always: Why It Is Wrong To Promote Amendment and Termination of Perpet… in this issue of the Harvard Environmental Law […]
[…] Environmental Law Review, vol. 37, n. 1, 2013, pp. 217-246, [en línea]. Disponible en Internet: http://www3.law.harvard.edu/journals/elr/2013/05/14/perpetuity-is-forever-almost-always-why-it-is-wr… [Fecha de último acceso 31 de mayo de […]