• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
    • Managing Board
    • Masthead
    • Advisory Board
    • Subscriptions
    • Alumni
  • Print Journal
    • Print Archives
    • Symposium
    • Submissions
  • Online Scholarship
    • Online Journal
      • Submissions
    • ELRS
      • About
      • Submissions
  • Membership

Harvard Environmental Law Review

Perpetuity Is Forever, Almost Always: Why It Is Wrong To Promote Amendment and Termination of Perpetual Conservation Easements

May 14, 2013 by wpengine

By Ann T. Schwing

When a landowner makes a charitable gift of a conservation easement to a nonprofit organization or government entity and elects to seek a federal tax deduction, both landowner and easement holder are subject to federal tax laws and regulations governing the creation, monitoring, amendment, and extinguishment of the easement. A nonprofit easement holder is subject to federal laws governing nonprofit operations. The nonprofit and government holders are also subject to state laws governing the operations of nonprofit organizations and the administration of charitable and other public assets on behalf of the public. All of these laws affect and restrict the ability of nonprofit and government holders to amend and terminate perpetual conservation easements. Contrary to representations made in When Perpetual Is Not Forever: The Challenge of Changing Conditions, Amendment, and Termination of Conservation Easements, 36 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 1 (2012), none of these laws can be ignored.

Cite as: Ann T. Schwing, Perpetuity Is Forever, Almost Always: Why It Is Wrong To Promote Amendment and Termination of Perpetual Conservation Easements, 37 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 217 (2013).

[btn link=”http://harvardelr.wpengine.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2013/05/Schwing.pdf” color=”forestGreen” size=”size-l”]View Full Article (PDF)[/btn]

Filed Under: Article, Print Articles Tagged With: conservation easements, property law, state law, tax law

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. Understanding When Perpetual Is Not Forever: An Update to The Challenge | Harvard Environmental Law Review says:
    May 14, 2013 at 9:56 pm

    […] the publication of The Challenge and corrects misunderstandings asserted in Ann Taylor Schwing’s Perpetuity Is Forever, Almost Always: Why It Is Wrong To Promote Amendment and Termination of Perpet… in this issue of the Harvard Environmental Law […]

  2. Referencias bibliográficas al día. Artículos de publicaciones periódicas « Actualidad Jurídica Ambiental says:
    June 20, 2013 at 6:08 pm

    […] Environmental Law Review, vol. 37, n. 1, 2013, pp. 217-246, [en línea]. Disponible en Internet: http://www3.law.harvard.edu/journals/elr/2013/05/14/perpetuity-is-forever-almost-always-why-it-is-wr… [Fecha de último acceso 31 de mayo de […]

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to the HELR blog via email

Click here to subscribe!

Contact US

To contact the Harvard Environmental Law Review, please email the Editors-in-Chief at hlselr@mail.law.harvard.edu.

Follow us on Twitter

Tweets by HarvardELR

Footer

Get the Harvard Environmental Law Review in your inbox!

Copyright © 2023 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in